Search Weight Loss Topics:

Home » Fitness » Second Time Lucky – Central Bank Issues Another Dear CEO Letter on Fitness and Probity Requirements – Lexology

The Central Bank of Ireland has published a Dear CEO letter following on from its recent thematic inspections of compliance by Regulated Financial Service Providers (Firms) with their obligations under the Fitness and Probity Regime. The Central Bank expects all Firms to take appropriate action to address the issues outlined in its letter and to be able to evidence this to the Central Bank, if requested.

Overview

In April 2019, the Central Bank issued a Dear CEO letter outlining its concerns regarding Firms understanding of the extent of their legal obligations under the Fitness and Probity Regime and indicating that each Firm, together with its Board, should review its fitness and probity policies, procedures and practices and address any identified shortcomings. See our related briefing here.

Subsequently, the Central Bank undertook thematic onsite inspections across a sample of Firms in the insurance and banking sectors, which focused on evaluating the processes in place to manage compliance with the requirements of the Fitness and Probity Regime. The inspections focused on the following areas:

The recent Dear CEO letter sets out the key findings and observations from the inspections together with the Central Banks expectations and is to be read in conjunction with the April 2019 letter, the Central Banks Fitness and Probity Standards and the associated fitness and probity guidance. Details of the findings and observations are set out in Appendix 1 of the Dear CEO letter. You can find the related press release and a link to letter here.

Awareness and understanding within Firms of their compliance obligations

According to the letter, the level of awareness of fitness and probity obligations was weak throughout many of the Firms, in particular at Board level and Board appointments were generally not subject to the same level of scrutiny or formality as other appointments to Pre-Approval Controlled Functions (PCF) or Controlled Functions (CF). In addition, in the Central Bank's view, many Firms lacked coherent fitness and probity policies and procedures.

Board Appointments

The Central Bank expects each Firm to:

The CEO should not be involved in screening Board candidates due to the potential for conflicts of interest to arise.

Policies and Procedures

While the quality of policies and procedures in relation to fitness and probity varied from Firm to Firm, according to the Central Bank the majority of Firms had disjointed processes that did not clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of the various functions performing fitness and probity related tasks.

Firms should consider whether they:

Due Diligence

The Central Bank identified the due diligence process as the area of most consistent weakness across all Firms both in terms of initial and on-going due diligence.

Initial Due Diligence

The Central Bank expects to see that each Firm:

On-going Due Diligence

The Central Bank assessed the conduct of on-going due diligence as particularly weak. In addition to each PCF and CF role holder annually certifying their compliance with, and their agreement to abide by, the Fitness and Probity Standards, the Central Bank expects each Firm to:

Outsourcing

When outsourcing PCF or CF roles to an unregulated Outsource Service Provider (OSP), the Central Bank expects each Firm, as part of its due diligence in appointing CF role holders, to obtain the required documentation and to make appropriate inquiries as to the OSPs process for assessing fitness and probity. In addition, an outsourcing Firm should have a process in place to verify whether PCF or CF roles are being performed in the context of outsourcing.

Central Bank Engagement

In the Central Banks view, overall, Firms have not adequately developed, documented or embedded their processes relating to engagement with the Central Bank on fitness and probity issues, including IQ submission process. Each Firm should consider whether it has:

Role of the Compliance Function

According to the Central Bank, each Firm should ensure that its fitness and probity processes and procedures are subject to robust compliance testing. The fitness and probity process should be subject to comprehensive oversight by the Compliance Function and periodic independent review by the Internal Audit Function to ensure it is fit for purpose. Firms should avoid placing over reliance on the Compliance Function, which could potentially create key person risk.

Next Steps and Comment

The Central Bank expects each Firm to review and assess the findings and observations set out in Appendix 1 of the letter, in the context of potential issues with their own systems and processes. Consequently, each Firm should take this opportunity to review its relevant process and procedures to ensure that they comply with the Central Banks expectations. Any Firm that has not already done so should also ensure that it takes into account the Central Banks letter of April 2019 when conducting this review.

As this is now the second time in the space of eighteen months that the Central Bank has written to remind Firms of their obligations under the fitness and probity regime, it is unlikely that Firms found wanting in this area in the future will be given much quarter by the Central Bank for any material failures in their processes and procedures around fitness and probity.

Moreover, Firms that take the time now to put in place best in class fitness and probity policies and procedures will be much better placed to comply with the anticipated new regulatory framework for individual accountability, once this becomes law (see our related briefing here). In this regard, we understand that the Central Bank (Amendment) Bill, which will set out the new framework, is in an advanced stage of drafting and is expected to undergo pre-legislative scrutiny as part of the Governments Autumn Legislative Programme. See our related briefing here.

Read the original post:
Second Time Lucky - Central Bank Issues Another Dear CEO Letter on Fitness and Probity Requirements - Lexology

Your Full Name
Your Email
Your Phone Number
Select your age (30+ only)	30313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120
Select Your US State	Select Your StateAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington,DCWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
Program Choice	Select Your ProgramInjectable HGHInjectable TestoteroneInjectable SermorelinInjectable Weight LossInjectable HCG DietInjectable Vitamins
Confirm over 30 years old	Yes
Confirm that you resident in USA	Yes
This is a Serious Inquiry	Yes
Message:

Home » Fitness » Second Time Lucky – Central Bank Issues Another Dear CEO Letter on Fitness and Probity Requirements – Lexology